DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)

$2.00 / $6.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 20.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 28.6). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$2.00
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$6.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$3.00
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.25
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	393K	131K
Intelligence index	28.6	33.7
Coding index	—	76.2
Providers	47	2
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2026-09-03
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 20.4× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons