DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.8× cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.29$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.41
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M262K
Max output393K236K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index—17.4
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172025-09-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.8× cheaper than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons