Hy4 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 34% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy4 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $1.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $0.41 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | 17.4 |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2025-09-11 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 34% cheaper than Hy4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking ≈ $900.00.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Kimi K3.1 Pro