DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.07 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 30% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.6 vs 5.5). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.07
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.0029$0.04
Context window1M262K
Max output393K236K
Intelligence index28.65.5
Coding index—26.8
Providers475
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-172026-08-11
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 30% cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $240.00.

More comparisons