DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek

$0.098 / $0.29

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta Llama

$0.35 / $1.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.5× cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 524K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	Llama 4 Maverick
Input price / 1M	$0.098	$0.35
Output price / 1M	$0.29	$1.00
Blended price (3:1)	$0.15	$0.51
Cached input / 1M	$0.0029	$0.17
Context window	1M	524K
Max output	393K	33K
Intelligence index	28.6	—
Coding index	—	16.3
Providers	47	2
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	No
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-10-17	2025-04-05
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 4 Maverick?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.5× cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 4 Maverick: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick: 524,288 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Llama 4 Maverick ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons