DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Sao10k
$0.65 / $0.75
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
S
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.6× cheaper than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.65
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.75
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.68
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M131K
Max output393K16K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172024-12-18
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 4.6× cheaper than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ≈ $1,675.

More comparisons