DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.0434 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.72 / $0.72
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta Llama
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.0434$0.72
Output price / 1M$0.30$0.72
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.72
Cached input / 1M$0.035—
Context window1M131K
Max output944K8K
Intelligence index——
Coding index69.1—
Providers27—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-312024-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.7× cheaper than Llama 3.1 70B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $236.80, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct ≈ $1,800.

More comparisons