DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek

$0.03 / $0.32

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI

$0.06 / $0.18

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 12% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (34.3 vs 24.6). DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).

	DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731	Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Input price / 1M	$0.03	$0.06
Output price / 1M	$0.32	$0.18
Blended price (3:1)	$0.10	$0.09
Cached input / 1M	$0.016	$0.012
Context window	1.3M	262K
Max output	944K	33K
Intelligence index	34.3	24.6
Coding index	69.1	57
Providers	30	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-07-31	2026-09-10
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 12% cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,310,720 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $220.00, Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons