DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

D

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek
$0.03 / $0.32
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
S

Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B

Sao10k
$0.65 / $0.75
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
D
S
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.6× cheaper than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B
Input price / 1M$0.03$0.65
Output price / 1M$0.32$0.75
Blended price (3:1)$0.10$0.68
Cached input / 1M$0.016
Context window1.3M131K
Max output944K16K
Intelligence index34.3
Coding index69.1
Providers30
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-07-312024-12-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 6.6× cheaper than Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,310,720 tokens. Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ≈ $220.00, Llama 3.3 Euryale 70B ≈ $1,675.

More comparisons