DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek
$0.27 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.0× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusNemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.27$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.02
Context window164K1M
Max output147K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index43.5—
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-222026-10-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.0× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons