Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

DeepSeek
$0.27 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
Claude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.27
Output price / 1M$0.50$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.45
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M164K
Max output128K147K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index—43.5
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072025-09-22
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 2.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ≈ $1,040.

More comparisons