R1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 5.0× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.6 vs 11.4). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
| R1 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.47 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $0.23 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.02 |
| Context window | 64K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | 13.6 |
| Coding index | 24.6 | — |
| Providers | — | 10 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 5.0× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.
More comparisons
R1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonR1 vs Claude Fable 5.2R1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashR1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashR1 vs Hy4R1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalR1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraR1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProR1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProR1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017R1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonR1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5R1 vs Nano Banana 2.1R1 vs Mistral Large 4R1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 4 CarbonNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Hy4Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 TerraNemotron 3.5 Super VL vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro