Claude Haiku 5.5 vs R1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

R1

DeepSeek
$0.70 / $2.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 5.7× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.5 vs 11.4). Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
Claude Haiku 5.5R1
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.70
Output price / 1M$0.50$2.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.15
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M64K
Max output128K16K
Intelligence index36.511.4
Coding index—24.6
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072025-01-20
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or R1?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 5.7× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs R1: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. R1: 64,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, R1 ≈ $2,650.

More comparisons