R1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 23.2× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 11.4). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 64K).
| R1 | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $0.0399 |
| Output price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.0784 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.15 | $0.0495 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Context window | 64K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 11.4 | 27.8 |
| Coding index | 24.6 | 71.5 |
| Providers | — | 42 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-20 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, R1 or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 23.2× cheaper than R1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
R1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
R1: 64,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: R1 ≈ $2,650, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.
More comparisons
R1 vs Gemini 4 CarbonR1 vs Claude Fable 5.2R1 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashR1 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashR1 vs Hy4R1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalR1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraR1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProR1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProR1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashR1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017R1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLR1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonR1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5R1 vs Nano Banana 2.1R1 vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro