Command A vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 18.4× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 13.1). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 256K).
| Command A | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.24 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.05 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 8K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 13.1 | 41.8 |
| Coding index | 27.8 | 71.5 |
| Providers | 1 | 31 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 18.4× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A vs Command A+Command A vs GPT-6 Luna ProCommand A vs GPT-6 LunaCommand A vs GPT-6 Sol ProCommand A vs GPT-6 SolCommand A vs Claude Opus 5.5Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCommand A vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCommand A vs Grok 4.7Command A vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCommand A vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCommand A vs GPT-6 AstraCommand A vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5