Command A vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 88.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Command A | GLM 5.3 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.50 | $0.0399 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.0784 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.38 | $0.0495 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.03 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 27.8 |
| Coding index | — | 71.5 |
| Providers | 1 | 42 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | 2026-08-26 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A or GLM 5.3 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 88.3× cheaper than Command A on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A ≈ $10,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.
More comparisons
Command A vs Gemini 4 CarbonCommand A vs Claude Fable 5.2Command A vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashCommand A vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashCommand A vs Hy4Command A vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalCommand A vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro