Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI
$0.30 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Codestral 2508 is 6.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
Codestral 2508Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.30$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.90$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.25
Context window256K1M
Max output205K131K
Intelligence index45.4
Coding index76.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-012026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Codestral 2508 is 6.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons