Claude Fable 5.2 vs Codestral 2508

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Mistral AI

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI
$0.30 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Mistral AI
Verdict: Codestral 2508 is 35.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
Claude Fable 5.2Codestral 2508
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.30
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.90
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.45
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.03
Context window1M256K
Max output128K205K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-08-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Codestral 2508?

Codestral 2508 is 35.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Codestral 2508: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050.

More comparisons