Codestral 2508 vs Nano Banana 2.1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Mistral AI

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI
$0.30 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Mistral AI
Google
Verdict: Codestral 2508 is 6.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Codestral 2508 has the larger context window (256K vs 66K).
Codestral 2508Nano Banana 2.1
Input price / 1M$0.30$1.50
Output price / 1M$0.90$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.03—
Context window256K66K
Max output205K59K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—1
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-012026-10-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Nano Banana 2.1?

Codestral 2508 is 6.7× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Codestral 2508 vs Nano Banana 2.1: which has a bigger context window?

Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750.

More comparisons