Codestral 2508 vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 3.0× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 256K).
| Codestral 2508 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.90 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 256K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 205K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-01 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 3.0× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Codestral 2508 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCodestral 2508 vs Command A+Codestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Luna ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 LunaCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Sol ProCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 SolCodestral 2508 vs Claude Opus 5.5Codestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedCodestral 2508 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashCodestral 2508 vs Grok 4.7Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashCodestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXCodestral 2508 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 AstraCodestral 2508 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5