Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Mistral AI

Codestral 2508

Mistral AI
$0.30 / $0.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Mistral AI
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 9.1× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
Codestral 2508GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.0399
Output price / 1M$0.90$0.0784
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.0495
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.03
Context window256K1M
Max output205K131K
Intelligence index—27.8
Coding index—71.5
Providers—42
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-012026-08-26
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Codestral 2508 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 9.1× cheaper than Codestral 2508 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Codestral 2508 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Codestral 2508 ≈ $1,050, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.

More comparisons