Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Anthropic
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.88
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 6.9× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (54.2 vs 20.1).
Claude Sonnet 5.5Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$10.00$1.88
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.58
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.0375
Context window1M1M
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index54.220.1
Coding index—68.1
Providers1022
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-282026-08-14
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 6.9× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5.5 ≈ $9,000, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $1,238.

More comparisons