Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 25.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 20.7). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Claude Sonnet 4.5GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.05
Context window1M1.3M
Max output64K944K
Intelligence index20.741.8
Coding index52.171.5
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-292026-08-26
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 25.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ≈ $13,500, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons