Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
X
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Sonnet 4.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.14
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.0028
Context window1M1M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index20.7
Coding index52.1
Providers2
Best provider uptime (30m)99.2%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-09-292026-09-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 1,000,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4.5 ≈ $13,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons