Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Arcee Ai

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Arcee Ai
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 48% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (36.5 vs 10.8). Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output128K80K
Intelligence index36.510.8
Coding index—25.8
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-04-01
Retirement—2026-10-26

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 48% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons