Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.60 / $3.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.60
Output price / 1M$0.50$3.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$1.35
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.12
Context window1M262K
Max output128K64K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index—48.2
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-02-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $3,000.

More comparisons