Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $1.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 5.5× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.6 35B A3B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (18.2 vs 16.9). Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the larger context window (262K vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price / 1M$1.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$5.00$1.00
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$0.36
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.05
Context window200K262K
Max output64K236K
Intelligence index16.918.2
Coding index43.941.9
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-152026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 5.5× cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, Qwen3.6 35B A3B ≈ $800.00.

More comparisons