Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic
$1.00 / $5.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Claude Haiku 4.5 is 33% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 16.9). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Haiku 4.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$1.00$2.00
Output price / 1M$5.00$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$2.00$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.10$0.25
Context window200K1M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index16.945.4
Coding index43.976.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-152026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 33% cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 4.5 ≈ $4,500, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons