Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Relace Search
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Relace Search is 2.7× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Kimi K3.1 Pro has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | Relace Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $1.50 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Max output | 944K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 46.5 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 23 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-23 | 2025-12-08 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Relace Search?
Relace Search is 2.7× cheaper than Kimi K3.1 Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Relace Search: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K3.1 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Relace Search: 256,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K3.1 Pro ≈ $9,000, Relace Search ≈ $3,500.
More comparisons
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 CarbonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5.2Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs Hy4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 TerraKimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProKimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashKimi K3.1 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLKimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProRelace Search vs Gemini 4 CarbonRelace Search vs Claude Fable 5.2Relace Search vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashRelace Search vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashRelace Search vs Hy4Relace Search vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalRelace Search vs GPT-6.1 TerraRelace Search vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro