Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 84.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (53.4 vs 41.8). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.1GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$50.00$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$0.24
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.05
Context window1M1.3M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index53.441.8
Coding index81.671.5
Providers431
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-012026-08-26
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 84.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00.

More comparisons