Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Z
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 33.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.1GLM 5.3 FlashX
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.37
Output price / 1M$50.00$1.25
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$0.59
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.09
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index53.4
Coding index81.6
Providers41
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-012026-09-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 33.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.

More comparisons