Qwen3.8 27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Seed 2.1 Turbo is 6% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Qwen3.8 27B | Seed 2.1 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $0.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $3.00 | $2.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.06 | $1.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.085 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 33.7 | — |
| Coding index | 68.1 | — |
| Providers | 16 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo is 6% cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Qwen3.8 27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens. Seed 2.1 Turbo: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340, Seed 2.1 Turbo ≈ $2,250.
More comparisons
Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.8 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedQwen3.8 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashQwen3.8 27B vs Grok 4.7Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashXQwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 AstraQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Astra ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Command A+Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 LunaSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 SolSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Claude Opus 5.5