Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 2.3× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 33.7). Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 500K).
| Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.60 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.80 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.40 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.40 | $0.085 |
| Context window | 500K | 1M |
| Max output | 450K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 46.4 | 33.7 |
| Coding index | — | 68.1 |
| Providers | 4 | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is 2.3× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5