MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed

Xiaomi

$4.35 / $8.70

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.42 / $3.00

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 5.1× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).

	MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed	Qwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M	$4.35	$0.42
Output price / 1M	$8.70	$3.00
Blended price (3:1)	$5.44	$1.06
Cached input / 1M	$0.036	$0.085
Context window	1M	1M
Max output	131K	131K
Intelligence index	—	33.7
Coding index	—	68.1
Providers	1	16
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	100.0%
Vision input	Yes	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-21	2026-08-14
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is 5.1× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ≈ $13,050, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons