Phi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Phi 4

Microsoft
$0.07 / $0.14
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Phi 4 is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 16K).
Phi 4Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$0.07$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.14$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.0875$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.016
Context window16K1M
Max output15K131K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers—1
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-01-102026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Phi 4 is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Phi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Phi 4: 16,384 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Phi 4 ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons

Phi 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimePhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePhi 4 vs Command A+Phi 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 LunaPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 SolPhi 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5Phi 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedPhi 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 4 vs Grok 4.7Phi 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXPhi 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi 4 vs GPT-6 AstraPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Astra ProPhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5