MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Phi 4

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Phi 4

Microsoft
$0.07 / $0.14
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
M
Verdict: Phi 4 is 2.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 16K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 4
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.07
Output price / 1M$0.28$0.14
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.0875
Cached input / 1M$0.0028—
Context window1M16K
Max output131K15K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers2—
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-212025-01-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Phi 4?

Phi 4 is 2.0× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Phi 4: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Phi 4 ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Phi 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimePhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePhi 4 vs Command A+Phi 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 LunaPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 SolPhi 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5