Phi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Phi 4 is 34.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 16K).
| Phi 4 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.07 | $2.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.14 | $6.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0875 | $3.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.25 |
| Context window | 16K | 1M |
| Max output | 15K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | 45.4 |
| Coding index | — | 76.2 |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Released | 2025-01-10 | 2026-09-03 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?
Phi 4 is 34.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Phi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?
Phi 4: 16,384 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Phi 4 ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.
More comparisons
Phi 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimePhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePhi 4 vs Command A+Phi 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 LunaPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 SolPhi 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5Phi 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedPhi 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashPhi 4 vs Grok 4.7Phi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashPhi 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXPhi 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashPhi 4 vs GPT-6 AstraPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Command A+Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 5.5