GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Phi 4
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Phi 4 is 2.3× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6 Luna Pro has the larger context window (1.1M vs 16K).
| GPT-6 Luna Pro | Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.07 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.50 | $0.14 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.0875 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.01 | — |
| Context window | 1.1M | 16K |
| Max output | 128K | 15K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 6 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-01-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna Pro or Phi 4?
Phi 4 is 2.3× cheaper than GPT-6 Luna Pro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Phi 4: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna Pro: 1,050,000 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6 Luna Pro ≈ $450.00, Phi 4 ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
GPT-6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6 Luna Pro vs Command A+GPT-6 Luna Pro vs GPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Luna Pro vs GPT-6 Sol ProGPT-6 Luna Pro vs GPT-6 SolGPT-6 Luna Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGPT-6 Luna Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGPT-6 Luna Pro vs Grok 4.7GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGPT-6 Luna Pro vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGPT-6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-6 Luna Pro vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Luna Pro vs GPT-6 Astra ProGPT-6 Luna Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Phi 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimePhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePhi 4 vs Command A+Phi 4 vs GPT-6 LunaPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 SolPhi 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5Phi 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed