Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.19 / $1.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 45% cheaper than Qwen3.6 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.6 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.19
Output price / 1M$0.47$1.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.42
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M1M
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-04-27
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 45% cheaper than Qwen3.6 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.6 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3.6 Flash ≈ $937.50.

More comparisons