GPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.6 Flash is 4.7× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.19 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $1.13 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.42 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | — |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | 51.3 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 7 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2026-04-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is 4.7× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.6 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. Qwen3.6 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, Qwen3.6 Flash ≈ $937.50.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3.6 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3.6 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.6 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3.6 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3.6 Flash vs Hy4Qwen3.6 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro