Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $2.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.1× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.26
Output price / 1M$0.47$2.08
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.72
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M262K
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index—45.7
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-02-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.1× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ≈ $1,560.

More comparisons