Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 14B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 14B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.22
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 14B is 43% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 41K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 14B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.22
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M41K
Max output944K37K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index—13.8
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152025-04-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is 43% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 14B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 14B: 40,960 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3 14B ≈ $310.00.

More comparisons