Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.23 / $2.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.9 vs 12.7). Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.08$0.23
Output price / 1M$0.20$2.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window262K131K
Max output131K118K
Intelligence index12.912.7
Coding index26.822.1
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-112025-07-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,610.

More comparisons