Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.0875 / $0.35
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 28% cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Input price / 1M$0.08$0.0875
Output price / 1M$0.20$0.35
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.0175
Context window262K262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index12.9
Coding index26.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-112025-07-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 28% cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons