Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.6× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Muse Glimmer 30BNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.30$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.20$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.52$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.04
Context window131K131K
Max output16K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-092026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.6× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons