MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Muse Glimmer 30B

Meta
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
M
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashMuse Glimmer 30B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.28$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.04
Context window1M131K
Max output131K16K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers2—
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-08-09
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Muse Glimmer 30B?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0× cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B: which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, Muse Glimmer 30B ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMuse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMuse Glimmer 30B vs Command A+Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 Luna ProMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 LunaMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 Sol ProMuse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 SolMuse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Opus 5.5