Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Nemo is 13.3× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 Coder Next has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.019 | $0.12 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.03 | $0.80 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0217 | $0.29 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.07 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | — | 9.2 |
| Coding index | — | 36.2 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2024-07-19 | 2026-02-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Mistral Nemo is 13.3× cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 Coder Next: which has a bigger context window?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Nemo ≈ $53.00, Qwen3 Coder Next ≈ $640.00.
More comparisons
Mistral Nemo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMistral Nemo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMistral Nemo vs Command A+Mistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Luna ProMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 LunaMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Sol ProMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 SolMistral Nemo vs Claude Opus 5.5Mistral Nemo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMistral Nemo vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashMistral Nemo vs Grok 4.7Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMistral Nemo vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMistral Nemo vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 AstraMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3 Coder Next vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3 Coder Next vs Command A+Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-6 SolQwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Opus 5.5