GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Nemo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Nemo is 27.1× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.37 | $0.019 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $0.03 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.59 | $0.0217 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.09 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-18 | 2024-07-19 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is 27.1× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Nemo: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Mistral Nemo ≈ $53.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5GLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGLM 5.3 FlashX vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Grok 4.7GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 AstraGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Astra ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Mistral Nemo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMistral Nemo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMistral Nemo vs Command A+Mistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Luna ProMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 LunaMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Sol ProMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 SolMistral Nemo vs Claude Opus 5.5