Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.12 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 Coder Next is 27.6× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 9.2). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3 Coder Next
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.12
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.29
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.07
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index57.69.2
Coding index36.2
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-02-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is 27.6× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 Coder Next: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Qwen3 Coder Next ≈ $640.00.

More comparisons