Claude Opus 5.5 vs Mistral Nemo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Mistral Nemo is 367.8× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $4.00 | $0.019 |
| Output price / 1M | $20.00 | $0.03 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $8.00 | $0.0217 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 57.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 11 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-07-19 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is 367.8× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Mistral Nemo: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Mistral Nemo ≈ $53.00.
More comparisons
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Mistral Nemo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMistral Nemo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMistral Nemo vs Command A+Mistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Luna ProMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 LunaMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 Sol ProMistral Nemo vs GPT-6 SolMistral Nemo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed