Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Nemo

Mistral AI
$0.019 / $0.03
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Mistral Nemo is 34.5× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Nemo has the larger context window (131K vs 82K).
Mistral NemoQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.019$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.03$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.0217$0.75
Cached input / 1M
Context window131K82K
Max output16K33K
Intelligence index9.8
Coding index12.1
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2024-07-192025-08-28
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Mistral Nemo is 34.5× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Nemo ≈ $53.00, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons